Grr. Had looked forward to 3.0. Tried it on an older machine and would not boot as livecd. Just got vertical lines. No joy. Tried a Dell B110 w/768 mb Ram with an ACER 18.5 X183CH crt and it booted livecd. However like 2.0 the fonts are so big it overpowers (takes up) too much real estate and is not acceptable. The splash screen has the buttons only showing the top half. A site like yahoo is too big to fit the screen. Until this is corrected...
I think this is the result of a very basic video driver being used automatically with your graphics set-up.
Could you possibly tell me what the output of these commands are, please? cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf | grep Driver lspci | grep VGA
Hopefully we can customise the configuration to improve it. That's the thing with LiveCDs, they have to work, sometimes they need to adjust to a very basic config. if the environment is a bit technically strange.
The commands are case-sensitive; please try with upper-case VGA. Alternatively, just the output of lspci will be fine :) This is to identify the graphics chip the system has.
Hopefully we can then identify the appropriate driver and further suggestions.
I'm a bit confused now. How many card and configs and machines do we have now, three?
@oldcity could try to install the xorg-xf86-video-intel package, switch the Driver line from vesa to intel and load the intel* kernel modules, as discussed in another thread.
@christophe would need to: tazpkg get-install xorg-xf86-video-ati to get the drivers. Again, the xorg.conf line should then be switched.
I'm unfamiliar with that wi-fi, is it a PCMCIA external card thingy?
I see why you comment this way but I did a copy past so i do not understand what went wrong. Below the exact sequence (i should have done that at first)
since it works properly under ubunt: what would be the commands to find what driver or module is loaded by the kernel under ubuntu ? wouldn't it be a good start ? and what would be the steps to proceed from here ? Thanks
For the ati driver: lol i really don't get it, but it installed after i suppressed the version number. In fact it appends the version number again and install that thing. Where would be the fun if there was no mystery ;)
@seawolf: sorry for the confusion. I have a desktop and a Dell C400 laptop.
The discussion about the ATI driver concerns my desktop, on which Slitaz runs well (and i installed the ati driver as you recommended). Consider this as SOLVED.
On my Dell C400 i have 2 problems: - a screen definition problem similar to what oldcity mentionned (I understand this is not necessarily the exact same cause though). Slitaz allows me to have 800x640 resolution only, while that laptop supports 1024x768.
- a wifi card recognition problem. That wifi card is not exactly and external PCI one. In these Dell there are 2 "internal" tiny slots, one for the modem one for a wifi card. Dell calls that "TrueMobile 1150 Series Mini PCI Card". It works out of the box with ubuntu, pclos, and i seem to remember, with DSL (but I could be wrong on that one). I am just hoping to have it work with slitaz as well.
For my screen resolution I will follow the recommandation you provide to oldcity to get the intel drivers, it could be the same, and will post the result.
Unfortunately, I see 3c59x in your output and orinoco in other websites. With help from either domcox or deadwait, I dealt with those on the old forum and well documented a patch needed for either one of those or a similar module ( I do not remember which) but all that work was deleted last year with the old forum and the forum manager with the archive has not posted the material.
Find the ubuntu module with lsmod, modinfo, or similar commands and try that module.
did the job, thanks for the hint! (it appears as eth1 instead of wlan0 but who cares)
Now I still have to solve the display issue. Actually the only display i get is 640x480x24, I believe loading the intel driver, and changing the xorg.conf as descibed here ==>