A "last edited on" timestamp would help.

its written here: http://www.slitaz.org/en/doc/index.html

New Wiki documentation

All SliTaz documentation is migrating; more information, books and manuals can be found at: doc.slitaz.org

http://doc.slitaz.org/en:guides:start

last edited on "timestamp" or "versionstemp" with the old version keeped for peopels how dosent use the lastest version ?

Take this as an example http://doc.slitaz.org/en:handbook:xwindow
The last edited note is at the bottom of the page in small grey characters. Not exactly the first place to look and the 26th of feb isn't that old.

So it *really* isn't clear that the info applies to Slitaz 2.0 not to Slitaz 3.0

Ok, I've edited that much, the rest of the page ought to be checked, at first glance it seems ok to me, but I'm not an expert.

jpeg

An excellent idea, imho; any work on docs is invaluable. There's a considerable number of forum posts that are essentially duplicates and I reckon an FAQ-type page would help greatly. It may be nice to wait for the developers to okay the placement of it, but perhaps something like:
http://doc.slitaz.org/en:cookbook:MostAnnoyingBugs or
http://labs.slitaz.org/wiki/distro/MostAnnoyingBugs

On a related note, I think a sweep through of docs would generally help. I've just sent a message* to the mailing list proposing a 'Summer of Docs'-type sprint. It's in the same vein as this but with a wider focus, hence why I've posted elsewhere. This could serve as the starting point, however.

- - - - -

@slicel -- The wiki contains a 'last modified' in the footer but no, the html docs don't. The default footer on the remains at © 2008!

- - - - -

* post: http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz/2010/04/msg00063.html

seawolf: How about creating an FAQ page in the guides section: http://doc.slitaz.org/en:guides:faq ?

Edit: MostAnnoyingBugs list must be on the labs wiki/issue tracker.